Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
George STOESS, Defendant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee
46 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George STOESS, Defendant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee.
No. 4402.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Jan. 17, 1931.
William I. Garrison and Thomas D. Taggart, Jr., both of Atlantic City, N. J., for áppellant.
Phillip Forman, U. S. Atty., and Douglas M. Hicks, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Trenton, N. J. .
Before BUFFINGTON and WOOLLEY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.]
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
In the court below George Stoess was convicted and sentenced on an indictment charging him and others with violating the Federal Narcotic law (38 Stat. 785, as amended, 26 USCA §§ 211, 691, et seq.). Thereupon he took this appeal. Serious questions arise as to whether his appeal is properly before us, but, assuming for present purposes it is, the case narrows down to whether the proofs warranted conviction. After a study by the Judges individually of all the evidence and discussion thereof in conference, we feel the proofs warranted Stoess’ conviction.
The judgment below is therefore affirmed.