Criminal Law · MBE-tested

THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. RICARDO ESTRADA, Appellant

133 Cal. App. 439·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1933·CA

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

[Crim. No. 1260. Third Appellate District. July 26, 1933.] THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. RICARDO ESTRADA, Appellant. Archibald M. Mull, Jr., for Appellant. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent. [MAJORITY — PULLEN, P. J.] PULLEN, P. J. Defendant was accused of the crime of robbery and by a jury found guilty of robbery of the second degree. In due time this appeal was taken and the cause submitted. The transcript of the evidence is brief. But three witnesses were called, the complaining witness, the arresting officer and an eye-witness to the commission of the crime. We find no errors nor was any particular point of law presented or argued during the trial. An examination of the record discloses no error in the proceedings nor does counsel indicate anything justifying a reversal. The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed. Thompson, J., and Plummer, J., concurred.