Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
John C. Fetzer et al., Receivers, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. David A. Kohn et al.; and John C. Fetzer et al., Receivers, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Jacob Miller et al.
194 U.S. 638·Supreme Court of the United States·1904
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 697.
No. 698.
John C. Fetzer et al., Receivers, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. David A. Kohn et al.; and John C. Fetzer et al., Receivers, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Jacob Miller et al.
[MAJORITY]
May 31, 1904. Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. Mr. Jno. S. Miller, Mr. Henry Crawford and Mr. Charles H. Aldrich for petitioners. Mr. Thomas A. Moran and Mr. Levy Mayer for respondents in No. 697. Mr. Horace K. Tenney and Mr. Henry R. Platt for respondents in No. 698.