Contracts · MBE-tested
COLORADO INTERSTATE GAS CO. v. STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS et al.
379 U.S. 131·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr-. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COLORADO INTERSTATE GAS CO. v. STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS et al.
No. 75.
Decided November 23, 1964.
Lewis M. Poe, Jr., James Lawrence White and Malcolm Miller for appellant in No. 75.
F. Vinson Roach, Patrick J. McCarthy, Mark H. Adams, Mark H. Adams II, Joe Rolston, Conrad C. Mount and Charles V. Wheeler for appellant's in No. 83.
James D. Conway, Mark H. Adams, Mark H. Adams II, Joe Rolston and Douglas Gleason for appellant in Nó. 140.
Richard C. Byrd and Dale M. Stucky for State Corporation Commission of Kansas et al., and Wendell J. Dog-gett, Jeff A. Robertson, G. R. Redding and Thomas M. Lofton for Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., appellees.
Solicitor General Cox, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and Peter H. Schiff for the Federal Power Commission, as amicus curiae, in opposition.
Together with No. 83, Northern Natural Gas Co. et al. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas et al., and No. 140, Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co., Inc. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas et al., also on appeal from the same court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were, taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr-. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.