Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Vought v. Columbus, Hocking Valley and Athens Railroad Company
176 U.S. 48144 L. Ed. 554·Supreme Court of the United States·1900
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Vought v. Columbus, Hocking Valley and Athens Railroad Company.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio.
No. 92.
Submitted February 26, 1900.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Brown]
Mr. Justice Brown
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was also a petition by a land owner for damages which he avers will be caused by the abandonment of the canaL The case took the same course as the case of Walsh, and the same judgment was rendered. So far as the constitutional question is concerned, the cases are precisely alike, and the judgment is accordingly
Affirmed.
This was submitted with' No. 90, ante, 469, and by‘the same counsel.