Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Administrative
Jane A. Lake, Respondent, v. John J. Nathans, Appellant
67 N.Y. 589·New York Court of Appeals·1876·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jane A. Lake, Respondent, v. John J. Nathans, Appellant.
(Submitted September 29, 1876;
decided October 6, 1876.)
This action was brought to have the assignment of a bond and mortgage, executed by plaintiff to defendant as collateral security for a loan, given up and canceled on the ground of usury. Decided on the facts in the case.
George W. Bandford for the appellant.
W. I. Butler for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Allen, J.,]
Allen, J.,
reads for affirmance of order granting a new trial, and for judgment absolute; Churoh, Ch. J., Miller and Earl, JJ., concur; Eolger, Rapallo and .Andrews, JJ., not voting.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.
On motion for reargument in above cause, it was claimed that judgment should have been modified and defendant allowed to retain the mortgage for a portion of the. debt secured, which it was alleged was not affected by the usury. Held, that if defendant was right in this claim, he should have gone back for a new trial, instead of appealing from the order granting it, as this court could only affirm or reverse the order granting a new trial; and, a new trial having been been properly granted, the order was necessarily affirmed, and judgment absolute given.
All concur.
Motion denied.