General

Georges Malval, Respondent, v. David Hosten et al., Appellants

275 A.D.2d 735713 N.Y.S.2d 499·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2000·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Georges Malval, Respondent, v David Hosten et al., Appellants. [713 NYS2d 499] [MAJORITY] —In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated September 17, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs motion to set aside a stipulation dated October 12, 1998, vacating their default in answering the complaint, and (2) an order of the same court dated December 3, 1999, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with costs. The Supreme Court properly set aside the stipulation vacating the defendants’ default and denied their motion to dismiss the complaint. The defendants failed to answer the complaint within the time provided by the so-ordered stipulation vacating their earlier default (see, Republic Ins. Co. v Northern Aire Dev., 88 AD2d 973). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.