Corporations
Morris Hartenstein, Respondent, v. Jock Holding Corporation and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Maurice E. Sobel, Appellant
226 A.D. 875·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1929·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Morris Hartenstein, Respondent, v. Jock Holding Corporation and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Maurice E. Sobel, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Proskauer, JJ.