General
In the Matter of the Claim of James Seymour, Respondent, v. Walsh, Connolly, Senior & Palmer et al., Appellants, and George H. Flinn et al., Respondents. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent; In the Matter of Raymond W. Stine, Petitioner, v. John F. Kirvin et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Rotterdam, Respondents
15 A.D.2d 831·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1962·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(A) In the Matter of the Claim of James Seymour, Respondent, v. Walsh, Connolly, Senior & Palmer et al., Appellants, and George H. Flinn et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. (B) In the Matter of Raymond W. Stine, Petitioner, v. John F. Kirvin et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Rotterdam, Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
[In each action] Appeals dismissed unless appellants shall file and serve records, briefs and notes of issue for the May 1962 Term on or before March 30, 1962, in which event motions denied.