General
SUTRO v. LINCOLN COUNTY; LUNING CO. v. SAME
62 F. 708·United States Circuit Court for the District of Nevada·1894
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SUTRO v. LINCOLN COUNTY. LUNING CO. v. SAME.
(Circuit Court, D. Nevada.
June 18, 1894.)
Nos. 578 and 582.
These were two actions — one by Charles Sutro, ‘the other by the Luning Company — against Lincoln county, each on a judgment against the county. Each ease was submitted to the court on an agreed statement o£ facts, and a jury was waived.
Freeman & Bates, for plaintiff Sutro.
J. P. Langhorne, for plaintiff Luning Co.
Trenmor Coffin and Geo. S. Sawyer, for defendant.
[MAJORITY — ' HAWLEY, District Judge.]
' HAWLEY, District Judge.
The principles announced In Vincent v. Lincoln Co., 62 Fed. 705, are decisive of the questions raised in these cases. Upon the authority of that case, judgment is hereby directed to be entered in favor of the plaintiffs herein, as prayed for in the respective complaints.