Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Annette B. W. Wetmore (now Annette B. Markoe), Respondent, v. William B. Wetmore, Appellant
171 N.Y. 690·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Annette B. W. Wetmore (now Annette B. Markoe), Respondent, v. William B. Wetmore, Appellant.
Wetmore v. Wetmore, 73 App. Div. 630, appeal dismissed.
(Argued June 11, 1902;
decided June 27, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 31, 1902, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for an injunction to restrain the plaintiff from issuing execution upon the judgment in this action.
Thomas P. Wickes for appellant.
Flamen B. Candler for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.