Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Jonathan Bulkley et al., Respondents, v. Joseph J. Little, as Receiver of the Worthington Company, Appellant
154 N.Y. 742·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jonathan Bulkley et al., Respondents, v. Joseph J. Little, as Receiver of the Worthington Company, Appellant.
Bulkley v. Little, 9 App. Div. 627, affirmed.
(Submitted October 12, 1897;
decided October 26, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 16, 1896, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
James M. Fislc for appellant.
Frederic A. Wa/rd for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.