Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In the Matter of the Estate of Elias W. Cady, Deceased
103 N.Y. 678·New York Court of Appeals·1886·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Estate of Elias W. Cady, Deceased.
(Argued October 26, 1886;
decided November 23, 1886.)
The following is the mem. of opinion herein:
“ We have carefully read and considered the evidence in this case and find it to be abundant to sustain the findings of the surrogate; and those findings conclude us. We agree in the main with the opinions pronounced by the surrogate and at the General Term, and it would be a waste of labor to travel over the same grounds in the exposition of the law applicable to the facts of this case in them so fully and ably set forth.
“ The judgment should be affirmed, with costs against the appellant.”
George E Goodrich and H. V. Howland for appellant.
S. D. Halliday for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Earl, J.,]
Earl, J.,
reads mem. for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.