Corporations
Town of East Hartford v. Ruth E. Cook
17 Conn. App. 813·Connecticut Appellate Court·1988·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Town of East Hartford v. Ruth E. Cook
(6412)
Spallone, Daly and Foti, Js.
Argued November 9
decision released December 5, 1988
Ruth E. Cook, pro se, the appellant (defendant).
David J. Wenc, assistant corporation counsel, with whom, on the brief, was Jose R. Ramirez, assistant corporation counsel, for the appellee (plaintiff).
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The defendant has attacked the factual findings and the legal conclusions of the trial court. Our review of the record indicates no basis to support her averments of error. Practice Book § 4061.
There is no error.