Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Catherine Kalb et al., Appellants, v. John J. Kalb, Respondent
183 N.Y. 507·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Catherine Kalb et al., Appellants, v. John J. Kalb, Respondent.
(Submitted October 12, 1905;
decided October 27, 1905.)
Kalb v. Kalb, 98 App. Div. 634, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment, entered January 19, 1905, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, which overruled plaintiffs’ exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, denied a motion for a new trial, and directed judgment for defendant on a verdict directed at a Trial Term.
George D. Forsyth for appellants.
Eugene Van Voorhis for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.