Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
David Earl MILLER, et al., petitioners, v. Tony PARKER, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Correction, et al.
139 S. Ct. 626202 L. Ed. 2d 454·Supreme Court of the United States·2018
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David Earl MILLER, et al., petitioners,
v.
Tony PARKER, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Correction, et al.
No. 18-6739 (18A528).
Supreme Court of the United States
Dec. 6, 2018.
Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice SOTOMAYOR and by her referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Middle Division denied.
Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from the denial of the application for stay and the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in Miller v. Parker, 586 U.S. ----, --- S.Ct. ----, --- L.Ed.2d ----, 2018 WL 6068929 (2018) (SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting).