Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Hunter H. Moss, Jr., Prosecuting Attorney, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Ellis Glenn
189 U.S. 506·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 197.
Hunter H. Moss, Jr., Prosecuting Attorney, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Ellis Glenn.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia.
Argued and submitted March 11, 1903.
Decided March 16, 1903.
Mr. William N. Miller and Mr. Hunter H. Moss, Jr., for appellants.
Mr. C. C. Cole for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Final order reversed with costs, and cause remanded with directions to quash the writ of habeas corpus and dismiss the petition. Baker v. Grice, 169 U. S. 284; Markuson v. Boucher, 175 U. S. 184; Minnesota v. Brundage, 180 U. S. 499; Dreyer V. Illinois, 187 U. S. 71.