Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Lawyers' Surety Company of New York, Respondent, v. D. Edgar Anthony, Appellant
151 N.Y. 620·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Lawyers’ Surety Company of New York, Respondent, v. D. Edgar Anthony, Appellant.
People ex rel. Surety Go. v. Anthony, 7 App. Div. 132, affirmed.
(Argued October 19, 1896 ;
decided December 1, 1896.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Oourt in the first judicial department, entered July 7, 1896, which modified, and as modified affirmed, an order of Special Term adjudging the appellant to be in contempt of court.
Henry T. Sanford and Raymond C. Haff for appellant.
Carlisle Norwood for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, on opinion below, with costs.
All concur.