Contracts · MBE-tested
In re Juanita BOLES v. Martha L. STEEL et al. Ex parte Juanita Boles
288 Ala. 732264 So. 2d 194·Alabama Supreme Court·1972·AL
MERRILL, HARWOOD, BLOOD-WORTH, MADDOX and McCALL, JJ.,. concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
264 So.2d 194
In re Juanita BOLES v. Martha L. STEEL et al. Ex parte Juanita Boles.
4 Div. 437.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
June 8, 1972.
Tipler, Fuller & Barnes, Andalusia, for petitioner.
Albrittons & Rankin, Powell & Sikes, Andalusia, opposed.
[MAJORITY — COLEMAN, Justice.]
COLEMAN, Justice.
Petition of Juanita Boles for Certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Boles v. Steele, et al., 264 So. 2d 191.
On preliminary examination we issued the writ of certiorari. On further consideration we are of opinion that the Court of Civil Appeals reached the correct result in its judgment and that the writ is due to be quashed. It is so ordered.
Writ of Certiorari quashed. .
MERRILL, HARWOOD, BLOOD-WORTH, MADDOX and McCALL, JJ.,. concur.