General
United States v. Edward O'Toole Co., Inc.
7 Cust. Ct. 606·United States Customs Court·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
United States v. Edward O’Toole Co., Inc.
No. 5514
Invoice dated Saumur, France, November 24, 1939.
Entered at New York, August 27, 1940.
Entry No. 765859.
(Decided November 26, 1941)
Paul P. Bao, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Auster, special attorney), for the plaintiff.
Brooks & Brooks, for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Tilson, Judge:]
Tilson, Judge:
Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal, without the introduction of any evidence. An examination of the official papers before me discloses no reason for disturbing the action of the appraiser, and I therefore find that the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by this appeal is the value found by the appraiser. Judgment will, be rendered accordingly.