Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Police Jury of the Parish of Acadia, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Crowley
245 U.S. 637·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 116.
Police Jury of the Parish of Acadia, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Crowley.
In error to the, Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana.
Argued January 4, 1918.
Decided January 21, 1918.
Mr. A. P. Holt and Mr. P. J. Chappuis for plaintiff, in error.
Mr. Philip S. Pugh and Mr. James E. Zunts for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Braxton County Court v. West Virginia, 208 U. S. 192; McCandless v. Pratt, 211 U. S. 437; Marshall v. Dye, 231 U. S. 250; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14.