Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Joseph Greenwald et al., Respondents, v. Augustus Wales, Sheriff of Broome County, Appellant
173 N.Y. 637·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph Greenwald et al., Respondents, v. Augustus Wales, Sheriff of Broome County, Appellant.
Reported below, 67 App. Div. 638.
(Argued February 9, 1903;
decided February 17, 1903.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 22, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the judgment was not appealable, the affirmance by the Appellate Division having been unanimous and permission to appeal not having been granted and that the exceptions were frivolous.
Alfred Epstein for motion.
H. B. Ilmmcm opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollar’s costs.