Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In the Matter of the Application of Milton E. Gibbs, Appellant, for a Writ of Mandamus against John F. O'Brien, as Secretary of State, Respondent
186 N.Y. 513·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Milton E. Gibbs, Appellant, for a Writ of Mandamus against John F. O’Brien, as Secretary of State, Respondent.
Mutter of Gibbs v. O’Brien, 115 App. Div. 881, affirmed.
(Argued September 28, 1906;
decided October 1, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 26, 1906, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the secretary of state to issue a new or further certificate of the number of inhabitants in the two senate districts of Monroe county.
George P. Decker for appellant.
Julius M. Mayer, Attorney-General ( William W. Armstrong of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, J"J.