Torts · MBE-tested
Giuseppe La Barbera, Appellant, v. The Union Railway Company, Respondent
191 N.Y. 537·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Giuseppe La Barbera, Appellant, v. The Union Railway Company, Respondent.
La Bm’berav. Union By. Co., 115 App. Div. 899, affirmed.
(Argued February 21, 1908;
decided March 13, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 14,1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover for loss of services and expense incurred by reason of personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff’s wife through defendant’s negligence.
George J. McDonnell, Michael O. Rini and Charles C. Smith for appellant.
Edward D. O'Brien and Henry A. Robinson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ,