General
VANCE v. UNITED STATES
279 F. 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1922
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
VANCE v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 16, 1922.)
No. 243.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Fred Vance was convicted of possessing property stolen while moving in interstate commerce, and he brings error.
Affirmed.
R. H. Elder, of New York City (Otho S. Bowling, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error. William Hayward, U. S. Atty., of New York City (William J. Millard, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error.
Before HOUGH, MANTON and MAYERt, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM,]
PER CURIAM,
Judgment affirmed in open court.