Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
United States ex rel. Brensilber et al. v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co. et al.
319 U.S. 733·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 761.
United States ex rel. Brensilber et al. v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co. et al.
May 3, 1943.
Mr. Homer Cummings for petitioners. Mr. Whitney North Seymour for the Bauseh & Lomb Optical Co. et al.; and Mr. Raymond M. White for Carl Zeiss, Inc., — respondents. Solicitor General Fahy and Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark filed a brief on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.