General
William Anderson and Robert Barry, Partners, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Inhabitants of the City of Bordentown, N. J.
223 U.S. 714·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 803.
William Anderson and Robert Barry, Partners, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Inhabitants of the City of Bordentown, N. J.
In error to .the.Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey.
Motion to dismiss submitted January 9, 1912.
Decided January 15, 1912.
Mr. E. A'. Armstrong for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. J. Spalding Flannery and Mr. William Hitz for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Writ of error dismissed
for the want of jurisdiction. St. Paul &c. R. R. Co. v. County of Todd, 142 U. S. 282; St. Paul Gas Light Co. v. St. Paul, 181 U. S. 142; New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336, 350, and cases cited; Hamblin v. Western Land Co., 147 U. S. 531; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Los Angeles Farming & Milling Co. v. Los Angeles, 217 U. S. 217, 226.