General
DUNLAP v. STATE
202 Ala. 69880 So. 893·Alabama Supreme Court·1918·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(80 South. 893)
DUNLAP v. STATE.
(6 Div. 821.)
(Supreme Court of Alabama.
Nov. 23, 1918.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 23, 1918.)
Certiorari to Court of Appeals. F. S. Dunlap was convicted of operating a penny-in-the-slot machine without license, and the judgment of conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals (16 Ala. App. 440, 78 South. 638), and he brings certiorari.
Writ denied.
Frank S. Andress, of Birmingham, for appellant.
Emmett S. Thigpen, Atty. Gen., for the State.
[MAJORITY — SOMERVILLE, J.]
SOMERVILLE, J.
Certiorari to Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment of said court rendered in the case of F. S. Dunlap v. State of Alabama, 16 Ala. App. 440, 78 South. 638. Writ denied.