General
Carroll et al., doing business as Harry B. Hogan Painting Co., et al. v. Lanza, doing business as Lake Charles Electric Co.
348 U.S. 870·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 375.
Carroll et al., doing business as Harry B. Hogan Painting Co., et al. v. Lanza, doing business as Lake Charles Electric Co.
Shields M. Goodwin for petitioners.
Edward L. Wright for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted.