General
R. H. Bowman Associates, Inc., Respondent, v. Richard Danskin, Appellant
43 A.D.2d 621·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1973·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
R. H. Bowman Associates, Inc., Respondent, v. Richard Danskin, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment, Supreme Court, Schenectady County, entered on Februarv 6, 1973, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Cooke and Main, JJ., concur; Kane, J., dissents and votes to reverse in the following-memorandum.
[DISSENT — Kane, J.]
Kane, J.
(dissenting): I find the decision of the trial court to he against the weight of evidence. The record demonstrates that defendant performed his professional services with that degree of care and skill required of those engaged in his profession within the locality. He did not guarantee the accuracy of his work and justifiably relied upon the accuracy of the map of the water district to locate water lines.