Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
De Witt C. Becker et al., as Surviving Partners of the Firm of David Bradt, Becker & Co., Appellants, v. John Krank et al., Respondents
176 N.Y. 545·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
De Witt C. Becker et al., as Surviving Partners of the Firm of David Bradt, Becker & Co., Appellants, v. John Krank et al., Respondents.
■Beolcer v. Krank, 75 App. Div. 191, affirmed.
(Argued June 12, 1903;
decided October 6, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 14, 1902, upon an order reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict directed by the court and granting a new trial.
-John A. JDeleJumty for appellants.
R. J. Cooper and Franlc Cooper for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for ■defendants on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Cray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Yann, JJ.