Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The Missouri Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Larabee Flour Mills Company
241 U.S. 649·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 460.
The Missouri Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Larabee Flour Mills Company.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted April 10, 1916.
Decided April 17, 1916.
Mr. B. P. Waggener, Mr. W. P. Waggener and Mr. A:E. Crane for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Joseph G. Waters and Mr. Charles Blood Smith for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction with 10 per centum damages upon the authority of—
(1) Roberts v. Cooper, 20 How. 467, 481; Supervisors v. Kennicolt, 94 U. S. 498; Clark v. Keith, 106 U. S. 464; Chaffin v. Taylor, 116 U. S. 567, 572; Thompson v. Maxwell Land Grant Co., 168 U. S. 451, 456; Illinois v. Illinois Central R. R., 184 U. S. 77, 90-93.
(2) Missouri Pacific Railway v. Larabee Flour Mills Co., 211 U. S. 612; Missouri Pacific Railway v. Larabee Flour Mills Co., 234 U. S. 459.