General
Alfred Kurtz and Another, Respondents, v. Joseph Misthal, Appellant
203 A.D. 844·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1922·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alfred Kurtz and Another, Respondents, v. Joseph Misthal, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Order modified by striking out paragraph 3, and from paragraph 2 the words “ or any of its officers, agents, employees, directors or any other persons,” and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondents; the date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Merrell, JJ.