Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
Guy T. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner, v. CENTRAL LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY, MUTUAL
73 F.2d 1000·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Guy T. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner, v. CENTRAL LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY, MUTUAL.
No. 9845.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
July 16, 1934.
Pat Malloy, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., Sewall Key, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., and E. Barrett Prettyman, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and B. M. Coon, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
■ Thomas Watters, Jr., and Maxwell A. O’Brien, both of Des Moines, Iowa, for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment of United States Board of Tax Appeals reversed, and cause remanded, with instructions to enter judgment in favor of petitioner, etc., pursuant to stipulation of parties.