Corporations
In the Matter of the Application of Lizzie Dworsky, Respondent, for a Peremptory Mandamus Order against Harry G. Coplon, as Corporation Counsel of the City of Schenectady, N. Y., and Another, Appellants
215 A.D. 855·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1926·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Lizzie Dworsky, Respondent, for a Peremptory Mandamus Order against Harry G. Coplon, as Corporation Counsel of the City of Schenectady, N. Y., and Another, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order reversed on the law, with costs, and motion denied, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that the petition does not disclose that the petitioner has a legal claim. All concur.