General
UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Richard K. GOULD, Appellee
73 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Richard K. GOULD, Appellee.
No. 2934.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Nov. 10, 1934.
J. Frank Staley, of Washington, D. C. (Francis J. W. Ford,' U. S. Atty., and Charles W. Bartlett, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Boston, Mass., on the brief), for the United States.
Albert T. Gould, of Boston, Mass. (Charles S. Bolster, Miles Wambaugh, and Burnham, Bingham, Pillsbury, Dana & Gould, all of Boston, Mass., on the brief), for appellee Gould.'
William B. Sullivan, Jr., of Boston, Mass. (John Y. Spalding, of Boston, Mass., on the brief), for appellees Chaney and Pogson, adm’xs.
Thomas H. Gardiner, of Providence, R. I., for appellee Turner, adm’r.
Before BINGHAM, WILSON, and MORTON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed on the opinion of Judge Hale in the court below (D. C.) 55 F.(2d) 674.