General
Rose Resnick v. David O. Resnick
150 Conn. 699·Connecticut Supreme Court·1962·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rose Resnick v. David O. Resnick
Baldwin, C. J., King, Murphy, Shea and Alcorn, Js.
Argued December 5
decided December 18, 1962
Henry J. Goldberg, with whom, on the brief, was Jacob Schwolsky, for the appellant (plaintiff).
A. B. Friedman, with whom, on the brief, were Samuel H. Friedman and Myron Friedman, for the appellee (defendant).
[MAJORITY — Pee Curiam.]
Pee Curiam.
The finding, which is not subject to material correction, amply supports the judgment. Medvedow v. Medvedow, 140 Conn. 698, 700, 103 A.2d 337; Gowdy v. Gowdy, 120 Conn. 508, 510, 181 A. 462; Swist v. Swist, 107 Conn. 484, 490, 140 A. 820.
There is no error.