Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
William Sobey, Petitioner, v. Wilford H. Holsclaw
203 U.S. 594·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 466.
William Sobey, Petitioner, v. Wilford H. Holsclaw.
December 10, 1906.
Mr. Melville Church, Mr. George P. Fisher, Jr., and Mr. James H. Peirce for petitioner. Mr. Edgar M. Kitchin and Mr. Edward T. Fenwick for respondent. Mr. Albert G. Davis for the General Electric Company, filed a brief as amicus curies.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied.