General
Arthur Lane, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem for Barbara J. Lane, an Infant, Respondents, v. Henry Sochacki et al., Defendants, and Town of Hempstead et al., Appellants
279 A.D. 595·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1951·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Arthur Lane, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem for Barbara J. Lane, an Infant, Respondents, v. Henry Sochacki et al., Defendants, and Town of Hempstead et al., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Ho opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur; Adel and Wenzel, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to deny the motion, with the following memorandum: The papers fail to include competent or sufficient evidence to warrant granting the application or to excuse the delay in making it. (See Kenney v. South Shore Natural Gas & Fuel Co., 126 App. Div. 236.)