Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The Consolidated Fruit Jar Company, Appellant, v. Frank P. Wisner et al., as Executors of Henry C. Wisner, Deceased, Respondents
188 N.Y. 624·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Consolidated Fruit Jar Company, Appellant, v. Frank P. Wisner et al., as Executors of Henry C. Wisner, Deceased, Respondents.
(Argued April 26, 1907;
decided May 21, 1907.)
Consolidated Fruit Jar Co. v. Wiener, 110 App. Div. 99, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 10, 1906, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action for an accounting.
George A. Strong for appellant.
William A. Sutherland and Ed/win A. Nash for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gbay, Edwabd T. Babtlett, Haight, Webneb, Willabd Babtlett and Hiscook, JJ.