Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
MacKnight Flintic Stone Company, Appellant, v. The City of New York et al., Respondents. (Actions 1 and 2.)
176 N.Y. 586·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MacKnight Flintic Stone Company, Appellant, v. The City of New York et al., Respondents. (Actions 1 and 2.)
MacKnight Klintia Stone Oo. v. City of New York, 78 App. Div. 640, 641, affirmed.
(Argued October 22, 1903;
decided November 10, 1903.)
Appeals from judgments of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 20, 1903, affirming judgments in favor of defendants entered upon dismissals of the complaints by the court on trial at Special Term.
L. Laflin Kellogg and Alfred C. Petté for appellant.
Louis Marshall for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgments affirmed, with-costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Cray, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.