Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In re Whittington
391 U.S. 972·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
June 7, 1968.
No. 701.
In re Whittington,
Daniel A. Rezneck for applicant.
E. Raymond Morehart filed a memorandum in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
ante, p. 341. Application for bail or release on personal recognizance or other appropriate conditions presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, denied. It is ordered that the mandate of this Court issue forthwith to enable applicant to apply for release on bail or otherwise to the appropriate court of the State of Ohio.