General
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
335 U.S. 854·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 251.
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
JohnS. L. Yost, D. H. Culton, John W. Scott and Harry S. Littman for petitioner.
Solicitor General Perl-man, Assistant Attorney General Morison, Paul A. Sweeney, Melvin Richter and Louis W. McKernan for the Federal Power Commission; and Donald R. Richberg, Carl I. Wheat, Charles V. Shannon, Stanley M. Morley, Eugene F. Black, Attorney General of Michigan, and Raymond J. Kelly for the Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.