General
REGINA M. PASQUALINI v. STATE BOARD OF FIREARMS PERMIT EXAMINERS
249 Conn. 904·Connecticut Supreme Court·1999·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
REGINA M. PASQUALINI v. STATE BOARD OF FIREARMS PERMIT EXAMINERS
Regina M. Pasqualini, pro se, in support of the petition.
Matthew B. Beizer, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
Decided May 12, 1999
[MAJORITY]
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 903 (AC 18308), is denied.
[DISSENT — BERDON, J.,]
BERDON, J.,
dissenting. I would grant certification on the following issue: Did the Superior Court improperly dismiss this administrative appeal when the pro se appellant, Regina M. Pasqualini, failed to comply with the technical requirements of General Statutes §§ 52-46 and 52-46a by not allowing sufficient days for the return day when the defendant, the state board of firearms permit examiners, claimed no prejudice?