Tax
BERRY v. STATE TAX COMMISSION
382 U.S. 16·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Mr. Justice Harlan,is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BERRY v. STATE TAX COMMISSION.
No. 229.
Decided October 11, 1965.
Robert N. Gygi for appellant.
Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and John C. Mull and Carlisle B. Roberts, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Harlan,is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.