General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Andrew Spoto, Appellant
110 A.D.3d 929972 N.Y.S.2d 923·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2013·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andrew Spoto, Appellant.
[972 NYS2d 923]
[MAJORITY]
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Camacho, J.), imposed October 11, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
[MAJORITY]
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]). Eng, P.J, Mastro, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.