Criminal Law · MBE-tested

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Trevor Robinson, Appellant

269 A.D.2d 612703 N.Y.S.2d 919·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2000·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Trevor Robinson, Appellant. [703 NYS2d 919] [MAJORITY] —Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), rendered June 12, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant contends that the identification testimony of the complaining witness should have been precluded because the People failed to provide timely notice as required by CPL 710.30 (1) (b). However, since the prosecutor provided good cause for the failure to provide timely notice, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion (see, CPL 710.30 [2]). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.