Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Swanson, Secretary of State of Nebraska, et al. v. Buck et al.
312 U.S. 653·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 312.
Swanson, Secretary of State of Nebraska, et al. v. Buck et al.
February 3, 1941.
[MAJORITY]
Pursuant to paragraph (c) of Rule 75 of the Rules of Civil Procedure and without prejudice to the future application of paragraph (e) of Rule 75, the motion of the appellees for a writ of certiorari to correct a diminution of the record is granted with respect to items 1 to 57 inclusive. The motion is also granted with respect to items 58 to 62 inclusive so far as the certification of docket entries and designations is concerned, which, however, are to be dispensed with in printing.