Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Burns v. Ohio
358 U.S. 943·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
January 26, 1959.
No. 581.
Burns v. Ohio.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 358 U. S. 919, to the Supreme Court of Ohio. The order of this Court of December 15, 1958, granting the petition for writ of certiorari is modified so as to limit the review in this Court to the question presented on page 2 of the petition for writ of certiorari which reads as follows:
“Whether in a prosecution for Burglary, the Due Process Clause, And The Equal Protection Clause, of the Fourteenth (14) Amendment to the United States Constitution are violated by the refusal of the Supreme Court of Ohio, to file the aforementioned legal proceedings, because Petitioner was unable to secure the costs.”
Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.