General
Charles G. Roosevelt et al., Respondents, v. James A. Roosevelt et al., Appellants
64 N.Y. 651·New York Court of Appeals·1876·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles G. Roosevelt et al., Respondents, v. James A. Roosevelt et al., Appellants.
(Argued March 20, 1876;
decided March 28, 1876.)
Reported below, 6 Hun, 31.
Affirmed substantially upon the opinion below.
George G. Dewitt and Charles A. Peabody for the appellants.
Edward T. Bartlett and George H. Yeoman, for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam]
Per Curiam
opinion for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.